checked 2026-09-20
city-campaign-production.up.railway.app
0xa2b38ffa6c138efdf925b2f1f63c337637a5e4f0
#168 of 521 by verified x402 revenue top 32%|
Direct recipient
Operator domainwhere the name comes from
Receives payments and keeps 98.4% of them.
★ Whether any address is operated by an AI agent is not verified. On-chain records show that a payment settled, not who or what decided to make it.
What it says it does · published by the operator in a public x402 directory
City Campaign raffle spin
Declared endpoint
https://city-campaign-production.up.railway.app/raffle/spinDeclared price100000 0x833589fCD6eDb6E08f4c7C32D4f71b54bdA02913 · across 1 listing(s)
Operator sitecity-campaign-production.up.railway.appobserved serving this address’s endpoints, not attested
The operator’s claim, not our finding. We print it beside the money so
you can judge whether the two agree. Against it, the chain shows $257.18 received from
195 payers across 2,624 payments,
and $253.00 kept.
Measured
Received
$257.18USDC
lifetime, exact on-chain · 20.8% proven x402 by settlement record
Kept
≤ $253.00USDC
upper bound · USDC only
Payers
195
exact · every payer captured
Payments
2,624
exact total
Classification — what we decided from those measurements, never a rating
Verdict, every day we ran
Verdict each day
organic payments on all 40 measured days · current streak 28 days
Days we settled on chain
2026-07-072026-08-03
28 active of 28 days · a gap is a quiet day, not a missing measurement
How a verdict can change
Every change is adjudicated in public and logged with its date and reason. Nothing here
is edited silently, and no verdict is ever removed from this row.
Trends
Every day in the span as a table (28 rows, 28 measured)
| day | settled USDC | settlements | average |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-07 | $2.20 | 22 | $0.10 |
| 2026-07-08 | $3.80 | 38 | $0.10 |
| 2026-07-09 | $1.80 | 18 | $0.10 |
| 2026-07-10 | $1.50 | 15 | $0.10 |
| 2026-07-11 | $1.50 | 15 | $0.10 |
| 2026-07-12 | $1.60 | 16 | $0.10 |
| 2026-07-13 | $2.50 | 25 | $0.10 |
| 2026-07-14 | $2.50 | 25 | $0.10 |
| 2026-07-15 | $1.50 | 15 | $0.10 |
| 2026-07-16 | $4.00 | 40 | $0.10 |
| 2026-07-17 | $2.20 | 22 | $0.10 |
| 2026-07-18 | $3.40 | 34 | $0.10 |
| 2026-07-19 | $2.50 | 25 | $0.10 |
| 2026-07-20 | $2.10 | 21 | $0.10 |
| 2026-07-21 | $1.70 | 17 | $0.10 |
| 2026-07-22 | $2.10 | 21 | $0.10 |
| 2026-07-23 | $2.10 | 21 | $0.10 |
| 2026-07-24 | $1.90 | 19 | $0.10 |
| 2026-07-25 | $1.60 | 16 | $0.10 |
| 2026-07-26 | $1.60 | 16 | $0.10 |
| 2026-07-27 | $2.10 | 21 | $0.10 |
| 2026-07-28 | $1.40 | 14 | $0.10 |
| 2026-07-29 | $0.90 | 9 | $0.10 |
| 2026-07-30 | $1.40 | 14 | $0.10 |
| 2026-07-31 | $1.10 | 11 | $0.10 |
| 2026-08-01 | $1.30 | 13 | $0.10 |
| 2026-08-02 | $0.70 | 7 | $0.10 |
| 2026-08-03 | $0.60 | 6 | $0.10 |
Read this chart with its coverage.
Cumulative settled is 20.8% of what this address received; the rest arrived by paths the settled
series does not reconstruct. It is not missing money — it is money this chart deliberately does not
contain. Read it as evidence, not as a verdict. The outbound-per-day layer began recording on
2026-08-05 and is forward-only, so days before it were never measured.
28 measured days from
2026-07-07 to 2026-08-03. Drawn from settlements only · a day we did not
measure is absent, never plotted as zero.
How it is trending
Every percentage is an average per measured day, never a window total. A total counts a morning AQUIX did not run as zero; an average simply has one fewer sample. A window needs 5 measured days on each side, and at least $1 a measured day to divide into, or it prints nothing at all.
Settled per measured day · 7d
−43.5%
$1.87 → $1.06
7 measured days against the 7 before them · a short sample
Measured in total
$53.60
across 28 measured days
2026-07-07 to 2026-08-03
No 30-day percentage: fewer than 5 measured days on one side of it. An absent number is a smaller claim than a wrong one.
Where it sends
0xa252…146f85.6%
city-campaign-production.up.railway.app7.2%
0x1da5…680d2.4%
0xdea1…4a062.4%
0xedba…d8fd2.4%
Shares of every USDC dollar that left this address, for its
whole history. 5 destinations in total.
How it was paid
carried a valid x402 authorisation100.0%
x402 confirmed — 536 settlements on record. Every one is a USDC transfer whose transaction carried a matching EIP-3009 payment authorisation, reconstructed from public Base state. This is the proof, and it rests on all of them, not a sample. Separately, a sampler looked at 6 payments on 2026-09-19, 1 day ago, and classified them x402 direct. That is an indication from a small sample, not a finding about this address, and where it disagrees with the settlements above, the settlements are what count.
Where the money went
destination
USDC sent
share
0xa252…146f
$3.58
85.6%
city-campaign-production.up.railway.app
$0.30
7.2%
0x1da5…680d
$0.10
2.4%
0xdea1…4a06
$0.10
2.4%
0xedba…d8fd
$0.10
2.4%
These are addresses, not identities · we name one only where
a public source already does. 1 of them hold a verdict of
their own. USDC only — the fold does not follow other tokens.
What we read off the chain measured
Facts, not judgements. Every figure below is USDC taken from Base settlements.
USDC received
$257.18
lifetime, all-route, exact on-chain
USDC sent on
$4.18
1.6% of received
Settled and attributed
$53.60
28 measured days
Distinct amounts
5
average $0.10
Volume processed · 30-day
$53.60
28 of 30 days measured · window ends 2026-08-03 · the rest are days AQUIX did not run
7 / 30-day trend
7d ▼ 43.5%
average per MEASURED day, each window against the one before it · mornings AQUIX did not run are excluded, never counted as zero
Not counted in retained
4 transfers
Separately, at least 4 transfer(s) across 4 token contract(s) are attributed to this address for tokens it never received. A block explorer will show them; we do not count them as outflow.
What we concluded from them computed
Derived figures, each stating the arithmetic behind it.
Reality ratio
98.37%
retained — processed
Confidence
Medium
195 payers · 5 distinct amounts
Volume backing
Elevated
$257.18 backed by 195 payers and 5 distinct amounts
Sybil state
clean
first-funder measured
Average per active day
$1.91
28 days with settlements
Consistency
100%
of days since first settlement had activity
Why this verdict
Named rule R3b · Flat fee, two-way flow
Payments are a consistent fee at irregular intervals, with some value flowing back — a relationship, not a one-way sink.
Kept of received98.37%
Distinct payers195
Distinct amounts5
In, out and kept — 2026-09-19
Not measured for this address on 2026-09-19. AQUIX builds this split from
two independent series and this address appears in neither on that day. That is an absence of
measurement, not a measurement of zero · the attribution is not claimed either way.
Who funded the payers
Sybil stateclean
First funder of the payers
0x1063…f695 · contract, treated as infrastructurePayers195 distinct paying addresses · 5 distinct payment sizes
A shared first-funder is a shared-funder pattern, so we name it.
The test treats it as a signal only when the funder is not infrastructure and covers 50% or more of payers
— most wallets legitimately get their first funds from one exchange, bridge or router.
Time and trust
First seen
Entered the register on 2026-06-28.
Final through 2026-08-03 · 28-day streak.
Verdict history
Every snapshot ever taken, never rewritten.
40 snapshots recorded · no verdict change: this agent has held the same verdict since first seen.
Corrections
No published correction affects this agent.
Late writes
7 completed day(s), disclosed · a day finished after it was first published, and we say so rather than quietly restating it.
Basis
Snapshot 2026-09-20 · methodology v3.2.
Retained and processed are never summed. Retained is clamped at zero, so it can overstate but never understate.
Check it yourself. Every figure on this page is reconstructed from public Base
chain state. No API key, no account, no trust required — open the address and compare the USDC
transfers against what we show.
Notes and limits
Paid through
No settlement in the 7-day window · 2026-09-14 to 2026-09-20 · is attributed to a named facilitator. That is not the same as saying no rail ever carried its money: the lifetime total above is all-route and covers the whole history, and this window does not.
Coverage of the daily series
20.84% of this agent’s money. The chart and the day strip are drawn from that series; the lifetime totals are not, and the two are never added together.
What this page cannot show for this agent
- Per day: in · out · retained this address has no in/out row on the newest complete day and fewer than two measured days in the daily flow series
How a rule works here
One sentence per rule, stating what the rule tests and citing figures already on this page. The threshold itself is not published, so it cannot be gamed. Rules are named so that a verdict which changes can be pointed at. The full set of rules
Everything else is measured, not inferred. A figure we do not hold is never rendered as zero.
