checked 2026-10-27
Unnamed x402 service
0x4b72afb60fc70132cdb4de1bede7702d0a7d2528
#737 of 995 by verified x402 revenue top 74%|
Direct recipient
Receives payments and keeps 4.4% of them.
★ Whether any address is operated by an AI agent is not verified. On-chain records show that a payment settled, not who or what decided to make it.
Claimed vs observed
Nothing is claimed.
No listing in any public x402 directory
was found for this address, so there is nothing to compare against what the chain shows.
The chain shows $30.80 received from 1 payer
across 17 payments, and $1.34 kept.
Measured
Received
$30.80USDC
lifetime, exact on-chain · 100.0% proven x402 by settlement record
Kept
≤ $1.34USDC
upper bound · USDC only
Payers
1
exact · every payer captured
Payments
17
exact total
Classification — what we decided from those measurements, never a rating
Verdict, every day we ran
Verdict each day
organic payments on the newest of 5 measured days · current streak 1 day
Days we settled on chain
2026-10-232026-10-23
1 active of 1 days · a gap is a quiet day, not a missing measurement
How a verdict can change
Every change is logged with its date and reason, and no verdict is ever removed
from this row.
Trends
$4.50 settled on 2026-10-23, across
1 settlement.
One measured day. A trend needs two, so there is no
line to draw and none is drawn.
How it is trending
Every percentage is an average per measured day, never a window total. A total counts a morning AQUIX did not run as zero; an average simply has one fewer sample. A window needs 5 measured days on each side, and at least $1 a measured day to divide into, or it prints nothing at all.
Measured in total
$4.50
across 1 measured day
2026-10-23 to 2026-10-23
No 30-day percentage: fewer than 5 measured days on one side of it. No 7-day percentage: fewer than 5 measured days on one side of it. An absent number is a smaller claim than a wrong one.
Where it sends
0x8454…9181100.0%
Shares of every USDC dollar that left this address, for its
whole history. 1 destination in total.
How it was paid
x402 confirmed — 10 settlements on record. Every one is a USDC transfer whose transaction carried a matching EIP-3009 payment authorisation, reconstructed from public Base state. No sampler has graded this address, so there is no second opinion to show — the settlements are the whole of what we know, and they are proof. AQUIX’s settlement record runs continuously from 2026-07-07; 2026-06-29 to 2026-07-06 is not in AQUIX’s record for any address, and payments before the record are not counted here.
Where the money went
destination
USDC sent
share
0x8454…9181
$29.46
100.0%
These are addresses, not identities · we name one only where
a public source already does. USDC only — the fold does not follow other tokens.
What we read off the chain measured
Facts, not judgements. Every figure below is USDC taken from Base settlements.
USDC received
$30.80
lifetime, all-route, exact on-chain
USDC sent on
$29.46
95.6% of received
Settled and attributed
$30.80
10 settlements on 10 days · 2026-10-15 to 2026-10-26 · the daily charts draw $4.50 of it
Distinct amounts
7
average $3.08
Volume processed · 30-day
$4.50
1 of 30 days measured · window ends 2026-10-23 · the rest have no published measurement
7 / 30-day trend
—
a trend needs 5 measured days on each side and at least $1 a measured day to divide into; this address does not clear both yet, so no percentage is printed
What we concluded from them computed
Derived figures, each stating the arithmetic behind it.
Reality ratio
4.35%
retained — processed
Confidence
Low
1 payers · 7 distinct amounts
Volume backing
Elevated
$30.80 backed by 1 payers and 7 distinct amounts
Sybil state
unchecked
funding provenance not measured
Average per active day
$30.80
1 day with settlements
Consistency
100%
of days since first settlement had activity
Why this verdict
Named rule R3 · Organic payments, no circular flow
Payments arrive in varied amounts at irregular intervals, and the money does not circle back to the people who sent it.
Kept of received4.35%
Distinct payers1
Distinct amounts7
In, out and kept — 2026-10-26
One day, measured two ways. These are different bases:
never add them together, and never divide one into the other. The day shown is always yesterday or
earlier — the settled series is reconstructed the following morning, so today is never complete.
Received
Forwarded
Kept that day
Via the x402 rail
$1.20reconstructed from exact-scheme settlements
$0.00nothing paid onward on the rail
$1.20received — forwarded, both from the settlement store
All USDC routes
$1.20every USDC transfer in, rail or not
$0.00USDC only; the fold does not follow other tokens
$1.20received — forwarded, both from the fold
Measured through Base block 53,123,542.
One day only. There is no per-day series across the whole history: the outbound layer
began recording on 2026-08-05, and this panel shows a single day from it.
Who funded the payers
Sybil stateunchecked
First funder of the payersnot measured
Payers1 distinct paying addresses · 7 distinct payment sizes
A shared first-funder is a shared-funder pattern, so we name it.
The test treats it as a signal only when the funder is not infrastructure and covers 50% or more of payers
— most wallets legitimately get their first funds from one exchange, bridge or router.
Time and trust
First seen
Entered the register on 2026-10-23.
Final through 2026-10-23 · 1-day streak.
Verdict history
Every snapshot ever taken, never rewritten.
5 snapshots recorded · this verdict has changed, and every change is logged.
Corrections
No published correction affects this address.
Late writes
No day for this agent has ever been completed after publication.
Basis
Snapshot 2026-10-27 · methodology v3.2.
Retained and processed are never summed. Retained is clamped at zero, so it can overstate but never understate.
Check it yourself. Every figure on this page is reconstructed from public Base
chain state. No API key, no account, no trust required — open the address and compare the USDC
transfers against what we show.
Notes and limits
Paid through
No settlement in the 7-day window · 2026-10-21 to 2026-10-27 · is attributed to a named facilitator. That is not the same as saying no rail ever carried its money: the lifetime total above is all-route and covers the whole history, and this window does not.
Coverage of the daily series
100.00% of this address’s money. The chart and the day strip are drawn from that series; the lifetime totals are not, and the two are never added together.
What this page cannot show for this address
- Name no single public name: either no directory, Basename or manifest carries this address, or it publishes several unrelated services and none of them is its name
- Claimed vs observed no listing in a public x402 directory exists to compare against
- Provenance grade per dollar this address has not been graded for provenance yet
- 7 / 30-day trend a trend needs TWO measured periods; this address does not yet have an earlier window to compare against
Why this address has no name
We check Basenames and the public x402 discovery directories. Either nothing is registered, or the address publishes several unrelated services and no one of them is its name. That is a fact about what this operator chose to publish, not a gap in the audit.
How a rule works here
One sentence per rule, stating what the rule tests and citing figures already on this page. The threshold itself is not published, so it cannot be gamed. Rules are named so that a verdict which changes can be pointed at. The full set of rules
Everything else is measured, not inferred. A figure we do not hold is never rendered as zero.
