AQUIX checked 2026-09-20

stableapify.dev

0x23d931f95831cee50b5f5edf4d0e88270f6c8411
#326 of 521 by verified x402 revenue top 63%| Unknown Operator domainwhere the name comes from
Receives payments and keeps 100.0% of them.

★ Whether any address is operated by an AI agent is not verified. On-chain records show that a payment settled, not who or what decided to make it.

What it says it does · published by the operator in a public x402 directory

Fetch items from an Apify Actor run default dataset. Body: { "token": "..." } from actors/call. First call per wallet pays via x402 proportional to Apify usage (capped at $1.00); SIWX replay is free. Poll /api/actors/status until terminal — calling before terminal returns 409. POST only — never GET; token in JSON body, not query string.

Declared endpoints https://stableapify.dev/api/actors/resultshttps://stableapify.dev/api/actors/valig/indeed-jobs-scraper/callhttps://stableapify.dev/api/actors/apimaestro/linkedin-company-employees-scraper-no-cookies/callhttps://stableapify.dev/api/actors/apidojo/tweet-scraper/call— and 4 or more further endpoint(s) not shown
Operator sitestableapify.devobserved serving this address’s endpoints, not attested
Also servesApify API
The operator’s claim, not our finding. We print it beside the money so you can judge whether the two agree. Against it, the chain shows $20.53 received from 120 payers across 885 payments, and $20.53 kept.
Measured
Received
$20.53USDC
lifetime, exact on-chain · 15.1% proven x402 by settlement record
Kept
≤ $20.53USDC
upper bound · USDC only
Payers
120
exact · every payer captured
Payments
885
exact total
Classification — what we decided from those measurements, never a rating
Verdict
Service
behavioural evidence · no named rule was decisive · the base classifier decided
Evidence strength
High
120 payers · 25 distinct amounts · what this means
Identity
Named, not verified
what this tier means
Register status
In the register — service
the other statuses

Verdict, every day we ran

Verdict each day
organic payments on the newest of 40 measured days · current streak 2 days
Days we settled on chain
2026-07-182026-09-17
37 active of 62 days · a gap is a day with no settlement for this address, except the 3 marked mornings when AQUIX did not run · 5 outlined days were recovered from chain and carry no verdict
How a verdict can change
Every change is adjudicated in public and logged with its date and reason. Nothing here is edited silently, and no verdict is ever removed from this row.

Trends

$1.05$0.53$02026-08-11 in $0.012026-08-11 out $0.002026-08-12 in $0.012026-08-12 out $0.002026-08-13 in $0.012026-08-13 out $0.002026-08-14 no row — not measured that day2026-08-15 no row — not measured that day2026-08-16 no row — not measured that day2026-08-17 no row — not measured that day2026-08-18 no row — not measured that day2026-08-19 in $0.042026-08-19 out $0.002026-08-20 no row — not measured that day2026-08-21 no row — not measured that day2026-08-22 in $1.052026-08-22 out $0.002026-08-23 in $0.102026-08-23 out $0.002026-08-24 in $0.072026-08-24 out $0.002026-08-25 no row — not measured that day2026-08-26 no row — not measured that day2026-08-27 no row — not measured that day2026-08-28 no row — not measured that day2026-08-29 in $0.012026-08-29 out $0.002026-08-30 no row — not measured that day2026-08-31 in $0.012026-08-31 out $0.002026-09-01 in $0.032026-09-01 out $0.002026-09-02 no row — not measured that day2026-09-03 in $0.062026-09-03 out $0.002026-09-04 in $0.062026-09-04 out $0.002026-09-05 in $0.142026-09-05 out $0.002026-09-06 in $0.512026-09-06 out $0.002026-09-07 no row — not measured that day2026-09-08 no row — not measured that day2026-09-09 in $0.012026-09-09 out $0.002026-09-10 in $0.412026-09-10 out $0.002026-09-11 no row — not measured that day2026-09-12 in $0.022026-09-12 out $0.002026-09-13 no row — not measured that day2026-09-14 in $0.102026-09-14 out $0.002026-09-15 no row — not measured that day2026-09-16 in $0.312026-09-16 out $0.002026-09-17 in $0.032026-09-17 out $0.002026-09-18 no row — not measured that day2026-09-19 no row — not measured that day2026-09-20 in $0.042026-09-20 out $0.002026-08-112026-09-20
money in (above the line) money out (below the line) no row that day
All USDC routes, rail or not · 21 measured days between 2026-08-11 and 2026-09-20. In and out are opposite directions, drawn either side of zero and never summed. Kept, running total is received minus sent, accumulated, and floored at zero to match the Kept figure above · which is why a conduit's line sits flat on zero for the whole span: it forwarded everything. No per-day kept figure is stated, only the running total, because money can arrive on one day and leave on another. No outflow was measured for this address in this window — which is not the same as none.
Every day in the span as a table (62 rows, 37 measured)
daysettled USDCsettlementsaverage
2026-07-18$0.077$0.01
2026-07-19$0.5659$0.01
2026-07-20not measured — AQUIX did not run that day
2026-07-21$0.1010$0.01
2026-07-22$0.101$0.10
2026-07-23$0.3738$0.01
2026-07-24$0.156$0.02
2026-07-25$0.011$0.01
2026-07-26$0.011$0.01
2026-07-27not measured — AQUIX did not run that day
2026-07-28$0.112$0.06
2026-07-29not measured — AQUIX did not run that day
2026-07-30$0.011$0.01
2026-07-31$0.077$0.01
2026-08-01not measured — AQUIX did not run that day
2026-08-02$0.077$0.01
2026-08-03$0.011$0.01
2026-08-04$0.066$0.01
2026-08-05$0.099$0.01
2026-08-06not measured — AQUIX did not run that day
2026-08-07$0.1111$0.01
2026-08-08$0.022$0.01
2026-08-09not measured — AQUIX did not run that day
2026-08-10$0.011$0.01
2026-08-11$0.011$0.01
2026-08-12$0.011$0.01
2026-08-13$0.011$0.01
2026-08-14not measured — AQUIX did not run that day
2026-08-15not measured — AQUIX did not run that day
2026-08-16not measured — AQUIX did not run that day
2026-08-17not measured — AQUIX did not run that day
2026-08-18not measured — AQUIX did not run that day
2026-08-19$0.044$0.01
2026-08-20not measured — AQUIX did not run that day
2026-08-21not measured — AQUIX did not run that day
2026-08-22$0.056$0.01
2026-08-23$0.1010$0.01
2026-08-24$0.077$0.01
2026-08-25not measured — AQUIX did not run that day
2026-08-26not measured — AQUIX did not run that day
2026-08-27not measured — AQUIX did not run that day
2026-08-28not measured — AQUIX did not run that day
2026-08-29$0.011$0.01
2026-08-30not measured — AQUIX did not run that day
2026-08-31not measured — AQUIX did not run that day
2026-09-01$0.033$0.01
2026-09-02not measured — AQUIX did not run that day
2026-09-03$0.022$0.01
2026-09-04$0.077$0.01
2026-09-05$0.077$0.01
2026-09-06$0.5151$0.01
2026-09-07not measured — AQUIX did not run that day
2026-09-08not measured — AQUIX did not run that day
2026-09-09$0.011$0.01
2026-09-10$0.022$0.01
2026-09-11not measured — AQUIX did not run that day
2026-09-12$0.024$0.01
2026-09-13not measured — AQUIX did not run that day
2026-09-14$0.1010$0.01
2026-09-15not measured — AQUIX did not run that day
2026-09-16$0.011$0.01
2026-09-17$0.022$0.01
Read this chart with its coverage. Cumulative settled is 15.1% of what this address received; the rest arrived by paths the settled series does not reconstruct. It is not missing money — it is money this chart deliberately does not contain. Read it as evidence, not as a verdict. The outbound-per-day layer began recording on 2026-08-05 and is forward-only, so days before it were never measured.
37 measured days from 2026-07-18 to 2026-09-17. Drawn from settlements only · a day we did not measure is absent, never plotted as zero.

How it is trending

Every percentage is an average per measured day, never a window total. A total counts a morning AQUIX did not run as zero; an average simply has one fewer sample. A window needs 5 measured days on each side, and at least $1 a measured day to divide into, or it prints nothing at all.

Measured in total
$3.09
across 37 measured days
2026-07-18 to 2026-09-17

No 30-day percentage: under $1 a measured day, too small for a percentage to mean anything. No 7-day percentage: fewer than 5 measured days on one side of it. An absent number is a smaller claim than a wrong one.

How it was paid

6sampled
carried a valid x402 authorisation83.3%
no authorisation we could read16.7%
x402 confirmed — 378 settlements on record. Every one is a USDC transfer whose transaction carried a matching EIP-3009 payment authorisation, reconstructed from public Base state. This is the proof, and it rests on all of them, not a sample. Separately, a sampler looked at 6 payments on 2026-09-19, 1 day ago, and classified them x402 direct. That is an indication from a small sample, not a finding about this address, and where it disagrees with the settlements above, the settlements are what count.

What we read off the chain measured

Facts, not judgements. Every figure below is USDC taken from Base settlements.

USDC received
$20.53
lifetime, all-route, exact on-chain
USDC sent on
$0.00
0.0% of received
Settled and attributed
$3.09
37 measured days
Distinct amounts
25
average $0.02
Volume processed · 30-day
$1.15
16 of 30 days measured · window ends 2026-09-17 · the rest are days AQUIX did not run
7 / 30-day trend
—
a trend needs 5 measured days on each side and at least $1 a measured day to divide into; this address does not clear both yet, so no percentage is printed

What we concluded from them computed

Derived figures, each stating the arithmetic behind it.

Reality ratio
100%
retained — processed
Confidence
High
120 payers · 25 distinct amounts
Volume backing
Low
$20.53 backed by 120 payers and 25 distinct amounts
Sybil state
clean
first-funder measured
Average per active day
$0.08
37 days with settlements
Consistency
60%
of days since first settlement had activity

Why this verdict

No named rule was decisive

None of our named rules was decisive for this address. Separately, 0.0% of everything it received went back to the addresses that sent it — it kept 100.0%.

Our rules that promote an address to a verified service refuse it above 30% circulation. Because no rule fired here that test was never applied — so rather than call it a service that earns, this page says what the money actually did.

This is not an accusation. Money returning to the same counterparties is exactly what a trading agent, a settlement loop or a refund flow looks like. We publish the measurement and the fact that no rule decided it; we do not infer intent from either.

Kept of received100.00%
Distinct payers120
Distinct amounts25

In, out and kept — 2026-09-19

Not measured for this address on 2026-09-19. AQUIX builds this split from two independent series and this address appears in neither on that day. That is an absence of measurement, not a measurement of zero · the attribution is not claimed either way.

Who funded the payers

Sybil stateclean
First funder of the payers0xa449…15ac · eoa
Payers120 distinct paying addresses · 25 distinct payment sizes
A shared first-funder is a shared-funder pattern, so we name it. The test treats it as a signal only when the funder is not infrastructure and covers 50% or more of payers — most wallets legitimately get their first funds from one exchange, bridge or router.

Time and trust

First seen
Entered the register on 2026-07-18. Final through 2026-09-17 · 2-day streak.
Verdict history
Every snapshot ever taken, never rewritten. 40 snapshots recorded · this verdict has changed, and every change is logged.
Corrections
No published correction affects this agent.
Late writes
4 completed day(s), disclosed · a day finished after it was first published, and we say so rather than quietly restating it.
Basis
Snapshot 2026-09-20 · methodology v3.2. Retained and processed are never summed. Retained is clamped at zero, so it can overstate but never understate.
Check it yourself. Every figure on this page is reconstructed from public Base chain state. No API key, no account, no trust required — open the address and compare the USDC transfers against what we show.
Open on Basescan This page as JSON How we measure

Notes and limits

Paid through
coinbase 17 settlements $0.17 USDC 12 submitters · 2026-09-14 to 2026-09-20. 17 settlement(s) in the window. Every one of them is attributed to a named operator. Settlement-scoped and 7 days wide, a different basis from the lifetime total above. A submitter we cannot name is counted under unnamed, never dropped and never guessed.
Coverage of the daily series
15.08% of this agent’s money. The chart and the day strip are drawn from that series; the lifetime totals are not, and the two are never added together.
What this page cannot show for this agent
  • Which rule fired no named rule was decisive; the base classifier decided
34 of 35 items in our published contract are present for this agent; the full contract is in the JSON.
How a rule works here
One sentence per rule, stating what the rule tests and citing figures already on this page. The threshold itself is not published, so it cannot be gamed. Rules are named so that a verdict which changes can be pointed at. The full set of rules
Everything else is measured, not inferred. A figure we do not hold is never rendered as zero.
#326 of 521 by verified x402 revenue
AQUIX Evidence before trust @aquixai intelligence@aquix.ai
The record
All published agentsKnown, not measuredMethodology and rulesDefinitions
This page
PermalinkMachine-readable JSONWhy this verdictThe operator’s own site
Why you do not have to trust us

Every figure is reconstructed from public Base chain state. No API key, no account, no trust required — open an address and compare the USDC transfers against what we show. Every verdict is adjudicated in public and logged with its date and reason; nothing is edited silently and no verdict is removed from the record.

AQUIX · an independent observatory of the x402 rail on Base · Measured daily at 07:00 UTC · 2026-09-20 · No protocol pays to appear here

Company names and logos are the property of their owners and are shown for identification only. Their appearance here does not imply any affiliation with, or endorsement by, AQUIX.