checked 2026-09-20
Unnamed x402 service
0xb3c2776ce3f99cb3366520c27b4ac5d436942ab6
#236 of 521 by verified x402 revenue top 45%|
Unknown
Receives payments and keeps 100.0% of them.
★ Whether any address is operated by an AI agent is not verified. On-chain records show that a payment settled, not who or what decided to make it.
What it says it does · published by the operator in a public x402 directory
Multi-model chat completions. POST messages[] and set model to any LLM id from GET /v1/models; dynamic USDC pricing scales with model and token usage. Hero: GET /heroes/chat-completions.
Declared endpoints
https://chat.gedx402.com/v1/chat/completionshttps://llm.gedx402.com/v1/llm/:modelhttps://social.gedx402.com/v1/sociavault/twitter/searchhttps://search.gedx402.com/v1/search/outcome/search-lite— and 4 or more further endpoint(s) not shownOperator sitegedx402.comobserved serving this address’s endpoints, not attested
Also servesllm, social, search, browser, embed
The operator’s claim, not our finding. We print it beside the money so
you can judge whether the two agree. Against it, the chain shows $105.82 received from
200 payers across 2,546 payments,
and $105.82 kept.
Measured
Received
$105.82USDC
lifetime, exact on-chain · 10.8% proven x402 by settlement record
Kept
≤ $105.82USDC
upper bound · USDC only
Payers
200
exact · every payer captured
Payments
2,546
exact total
Classification — what we decided from those measurements, never a rating
Verdict, every day we ran
Verdict each day
organic payments on all 40 measured days · current streak 9 days
Days we settled on chain
2026-07-082026-09-18
69 active of 73 days · a gap is a day with no settlement for this address, except the 3 marked mornings when AQUIX did not run · 11 outlined days were recovered from chain and carry no verdict
How a verdict can change
Every change is adjudicated in public and logged with its date and reason. Nothing here
is edited silently, and no verdict is ever removed from this row.
Trends
money in (above the line)
money out (below the line)
no row that day
All USDC routes, rail or not ·
39 measured days between 2026-08-11 and
2026-09-19. In and out are opposite directions, drawn either side of zero and never summed. Kept, running total is received minus sent, accumulated, and floored at zero to
match the Kept figure above · which is why a conduit's line sits flat on zero for the
whole span: it forwarded everything. No per-day kept figure is stated, only the running
total, because money can arrive on one day and leave on another. No outflow was measured for this
address in this window — which is not the same as none.
Every day in the span as a table (73 rows, 69 measured)
| day | settled USDC | settlements | average |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-08 | $0.21 | 10 | $0.02 |
| 2026-07-09 | $0.74 | 9 | $0.08 |
| 2026-07-10 | $0.19 | 17 | $0.01 |
| 2026-07-11 | $0.55 | 29 | $0.02 |
| 2026-07-12 | $0.06 | 11 | $0.01 |
| 2026-07-13 | $1.04 | 80 | $0.01 |
| 2026-07-14 | $0.10 | 9 | $0.01 |
| 2026-07-15 | $1.04 | 278 | $0.00 |
| 2026-07-16 | $0.22 | 21 | $0.01 |
| 2026-07-17 | $0.74 | 29 | $0.03 |
| 2026-07-18 | $0.45 | 18 | $0.03 |
| 2026-07-19 | $0.10 | 9 | $0.01 |
| 2026-07-20 | $0.35 | 30 | $0.01 |
| 2026-07-21 | $0.28 | 26 | $0.01 |
| 2026-07-22 | $0.46 | 62 | $0.01 |
| 2026-07-23 | $1.09 | 52 | $0.02 |
| 2026-07-24 | $0.04 | 9 | $0.00 |
| 2026-07-25 | $0.57 | 33 | $0.02 |
| 2026-07-26 | $0.10 | 14 | $0.01 |
| 2026-07-27 | $0.01 | 7 | $0.00 |
| 2026-07-28 | $0.05 | 7 | $0.01 |
| 2026-07-29 | $0.01 | 7 | $0.00 |
| 2026-07-30 | $0.05 | 7 | $0.01 |
| 2026-07-31 | $0.02 | 8 | $0.00 |
| 2026-08-01 | $0.02 | 7 | $0.00 |
| 2026-08-02 | $0.01 | 6 | $0.00 |
| 2026-08-03 | $0.12 | 14 | $0.01 |
| 2026-08-04 | $0.05 | 10 | $0.00 |
| 2026-08-05 | $0.11 | 17 | $0.01 |
| 2026-08-06 | $0.07 | 9 | $0.01 |
| 2026-08-07 | $0.01 | 7 | $0.00 |
| 2026-08-08 | $0.01 | 7 | $0.00 |
| 2026-08-09 | $0.10 | 16 | $0.01 |
| 2026-08-10 | $0.39 | 31 | $0.01 |
| 2026-08-11 | $0.02 | 8 | $0.00 |
| 2026-08-12 | $0.03 | 15 | $0.00 |
| 2026-08-13 | $0.13 | 14 | $0.01 |
| 2026-08-14 | $0.01 | 9 | $0.00 |
| 2026-08-15 | $0.01 | 7 | $0.00 |
| 2026-08-16 | $0.02 | 8 | $0.00 |
| 2026-08-17 | $0.01 | 7 | $0.00 |
| 2026-08-18 | $0.01 | 9 | $0.00 |
| 2026-08-19 | $0.02 | 7 | $0.00 |
| 2026-08-20 | $0.02 | 10 | $0.00 |
| 2026-08-21 | $0.01 | 11 | $0.00 |
| 2026-08-22 | $0.01 | 6 | $0.00 |
| 2026-08-23 | $0.01 | 5 | $0.00 |
| 2026-08-24 | $0.01 | 5 | $0.00 |
| 2026-08-25 | $0.05 | 7 | $0.01 |
| 2026-08-26 | $0.01 | 5 | $0.00 |
| 2026-08-27 | $0.02 | 5 | $0.00 |
| 2026-08-28 | $0.03 | 8 | $0.00 |
| 2026-08-29 | $0.01 | 6 | $0.00 |
| 2026-08-30 | not measured — AQUIX did not run that day | ||
| 2026-08-31 | not measured — AQUIX did not run that day | ||
| 2026-09-01 | $0.02 | 8 | $0.00 |
| 2026-09-02 | not measured — AQUIX did not run that day | ||
| 2026-09-03 | $0.09 | 11 | $0.01 |
| 2026-09-04 | $0.02 | 6 | $0.00 |
| 2026-09-05 | $0.38 | 12 | $0.03 |
| 2026-09-06 | $0.45 | 18 | $0.02 |
| 2026-09-07 | $0.13 | 3 | $0.04 |
| 2026-09-08 | $0.00 | 3 | $0.00 |
| 2026-09-09 | not measured — AQUIX did not run that day | ||
| 2026-09-10 | $0.04 | 1 | $0.04 |
| 2026-09-11 | $0.06 | 6 | $0.01 |
| 2026-09-12 | $0.27 | 19 | $0.01 |
| 2026-09-13 | $0.00 | 1 | $0.00 |
| 2026-09-14 | $0.01 | 3 | $0.00 |
| 2026-09-15 | $0.00 | 1 | $0.00 |
| 2026-09-16 | $0.03 | 12 | $0.00 |
| 2026-09-17 | $0.02 | 7 | $0.00 |
| 2026-09-18 | $0.18 | 42 | $0.00 |
Read this chart with its coverage.
Cumulative settled is 10.8% of what this address received; the rest arrived by paths the settled
series does not reconstruct. It is not missing money — it is money this chart deliberately does not
contain. Read it as evidence, not as a verdict. The outbound-per-day layer began recording on
2026-08-05 and is forward-only, so days before it were never measured.
69 measured days from
2026-07-08 to 2026-09-18. Drawn from settlements only · a day we did not
measure is absent, never plotted as zero.
How it is trending
Every percentage is an average per measured day, never a window total. A total counts a morning AQUIX did not run as zero; an average simply has one fewer sample. A window needs 5 measured days on each side, and at least $1 a measured day to divide into, or it prints nothing at all.
Measured in total
$11.46
across 69 measured days
2026-07-08 to 2026-09-18
No 30-day percentage: under $1 a measured day, too small for a percentage to mean anything. No 7-day percentage: under $1 a measured day, too small for a percentage to mean anything. An absent number is a smaller claim than a wrong one.
How it was paid
carried a valid x402 authorisation83.3%
no authorisation we could read16.7%
x402 confirmed — 1,250 settlements on record. Every one is a USDC transfer whose transaction carried a matching EIP-3009 payment authorisation, reconstructed from public Base state. This is the proof, and it rests on all of them, not a sample. Separately, a sampler looked at 6 payments on 2026-09-19, 1 day ago, and classified them x402 direct. That is an indication from a small sample, not a finding about this address, and where it disagrees with the settlements above, the settlements are what count.
What we read off the chain measured
Facts, not judgements. Every figure below is USDC taken from Base settlements.
USDC received
$105.82
lifetime, all-route, exact on-chain
USDC sent on
$0.00
0.0% of received
Settled and attributed
$11.46
69 measured days
Distinct amounts
65
average $0.04
Volume processed · 30-day
$1.86
26 of 30 days measured · window ends 2026-09-18 · the rest are days AQUIX did not run
7 / 30-day trend
—
a trend needs 5 measured days on each side and at least $1 a measured day to divide into; this address does not clear both yet, so no percentage is printed
What we concluded from them computed
Derived figures, each stating the arithmetic behind it.
Reality ratio
100%
retained — processed
Confidence
High
200 payers · 65 distinct amounts
Volume backing
Low
$105.82 backed by 200 payers and 65 distinct amounts
Sybil state
clean
first-funder measured
Average per active day
$0.17
69 days with settlements
Consistency
95%
of days since first settlement had activity
Why this verdict
No named rule was decisive
None of our named rules was decisive for this address. Separately, 0.0% of everything it received went back to the addresses that sent it — it kept 100.0%.
Our rules that promote an address to a verified service refuse it above 30% circulation. Because no rule fired here that test was never applied — so rather than call it a service that earns, this page says what the money actually did.
This is not an accusation. Money returning to the same counterparties is exactly what a trading agent, a settlement loop or a refund flow looks like. We publish the measurement and the fact that no rule decided it; we do not infer intent from either.
Kept of received100.00%
Distinct payers200
Distinct amounts65
In, out and kept — 2026-09-19
One day, measured two ways. These are different bases:
never add them together, and never divide one into the other. The day shown is always yesterday or
earlier — the settled series is reconstructed the following morning, so today is never complete.
Received
Forwarded
Kept
Via the x402 rail
$0.39reconstructed from exact-scheme settlements
$0.00nothing paid onward on the rail
$0.39received — forwarded, both from the settlement store
All USDC routes
$0.39every USDC transfer in, rail or not
$0.00USDC only; the fold does not follow other tokens
$0.39received — forwarded, both from the fold
Measured through Base block 51,499,937.
One day only. There is no per-day series across the whole history: the outbound layer
began recording on 2026-08-05, and this panel shows a single day from it.
Who funded the payers
Sybil stateclean
First funder of the payers
0xf70d…dbef · hot-wallet, treated as infrastructurePayers200 distinct paying addresses · 65 distinct payment sizes
A shared first-funder is a shared-funder pattern, so we name it.
The test treats it as a signal only when the funder is not infrastructure and covers 50% or more of payers
— most wallets legitimately get their first funds from one exchange, bridge or router.
Time and trust
First seen
Entered the register on 2026-06-20.
Final through 2026-09-18 · 9-day streak.
Verdict history
Every snapshot ever taken, never rewritten.
40 snapshots recorded · no verdict change: this agent has held the same verdict since first seen.
Corrections
No published correction affects this agent.
Late writes
16 completed day(s), disclosed · a day finished after it was first published, and we say so rather than quietly restating it.
Basis
Snapshot 2026-09-20 · methodology v3.2.
Retained and processed are never summed. Retained is clamped at zero, so it can overstate but never understate.
Check it yourself. Every figure on this page is reconstructed from public Base
chain state. No API key, no account, no trust required — open the address and compare the USDC
transfers against what we show.
Notes and limits
Paid through
coinbase 134 settlements $0.64 USDC 20 submitters · 2026-09-14 to 2026-09-20. 134 settlement(s) in the window. Every one of them is attributed to a named operator. Settlement-scoped and 7 days wide, a different basis from the lifetime total above. A submitter we cannot name is counted under unnamed, never dropped and never guessed.
Coverage of the daily series
10.83% of this agent’s money. The chart and the day strip are drawn from that series; the lifetime totals are not, and the two are never added together.
What this page cannot show for this agent
- Name no single public name: either no directory, Basename or manifest carries this address, or it publishes several unrelated services and none of them is its name
- Which rule fired no named rule was decisive; the base classifier decided
Why this agent has no name
We check Basenames, the public x402 discovery directories, ERC-8004, Farcaster, contract bytecode and published deployment manifests. Either nothing is registered, or the address publishes several unrelated services and no one of them is its name. That is a fact about what this operator chose to publish, not a gap in the audit.
How a rule works here
One sentence per rule, stating what the rule tests and citing figures already on this page. The threshold itself is not published, so it cannot be gamed. Rules are named so that a verdict which changes can be pointed at. The full set of rules
Everything else is measured, not inferred. A figure we do not hold is never rendered as zero.
