checked 2026-10-10
Treza
0xae393a9cd728f7397f50f6f8c88096a0f3d2b42c
#646 of 770 by verified x402 revenue top 84%|
Direct recipient
Declared · x402 directorywhere the name comes from
Receives payments and keeps 94.3% of them.
★ Whether any address is operated by an AI agent is not verified. On-chain records show that a payment settled, not who or what decided to make it.
What it says it does · published by the operator in a public x402 directory
Generate a video from a text prompt, or animate an image_url from its first frame. The paid response waits about as long as the model usually takes to render and returns the video URL, else a statusUrl to poll (Prefer: wait=N sets the wait). 8 models including Google Veo 3.1, Kling 3.0, Seedance 2.5, Wan 2.7 and MiniMax Hailuo 3, 4 to 15 seconds, 16:9 or 9:16, from $0.42. GET this URL for every model and price. No account or API key: the payment is the only credential.
Declared endpoints
https://www.trezalabs.com/api/x402/videohttps://www.trezalabs.com/api/x402/speechOperator sitetrezalabs.comobserved serving this address’s endpoints, not attested
Corroborated bytrezalabs.comthe operator’s own registered domain serves this address’s endpoints · a second independent signal
The operator’s claim, not our finding. We print it beside the money so
you can judge whether the two agree. Against it, the chain shows $85.69 received from
17 payers across 90 payments,
and $80.77 kept.
Measured
Received
$85.69USDC
lifetime, exact on-chain · no x402 settlement on record for this address
Kept
≤ $80.77USDC
upper bound · USDC only
Payers
17
exact · every payer captured
Payments
90
exact total
Classification — what we decided from those measurements, never a rating
Verdict, every day we ran
Verdict each day
organic payments on all 1 measured day
How a verdict can change
Every change is adjudicated in public and logged with its date and reason. Nothing here
is edited silently, and no verdict is ever removed from this row.
Trends not verdict-backed
Every day in the span as a table (15 rows, 12 measured)
| day | settled USDC | settlements | average |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-24 | $1.66 | — | — |
| 2026-09-25 | $7.14 | — | — |
| 2026-09-26 | $0.84 | — | — |
| 2026-09-27 | not measured — AQUIX did not run that day | ||
| 2026-09-28 | not measured — AQUIX did not run that day | ||
| 2026-09-29 | $0.48 | — | — |
| 2026-09-30 | not measured — AQUIX did not run that day | ||
| 2026-10-01 | $0.36 | — | — |
| 2026-10-02 | $7.90 | — | — |
| 2026-10-03 | $0.06 | — | — |
| 2026-10-04 | $0.48 | — | — |
| 2026-10-05 | $0.04 | — | — |
| 2026-10-06 | $0.48 | — | — |
| 2026-10-07 | $0.19 | — | — |
| 2026-10-08 | $0.04 | — | — |
These days were measured but not judged. We hold
81 settlements worth $19.67 across
12 days (2026-09-24 to 2026-10-08),
but no verdict was recorded for those days at the time. They are charted so the money is visible,
and marked so the difference is not lost. Average per day shown $1.64
· of the days present, not of the calendar.
Where it sends
0x0d24…a4ff100.0%
Shares of every USDC dollar that left this address, for its
whole history. 1 destination in total.
How it was paid
x402 confirmed — 81 settlements on record. Every one is a USDC transfer whose transaction carried a matching EIP-3009 payment authorisation, reconstructed from public Base state. No sampler has graded this address, so there is no second opinion to show — the settlements are the whole of what we know, and they are proof.
Where the money went
destination
USDC sent
share
0x0d24…a4ff
$4.92
100.0%
These are addresses, not identities · we name one only where
a public source already does. USDC only — the fold does not follow other tokens.
What we read off the chain measured
Facts, not judgements. Every figure below is USDC taken from Base settlements.
USDC received
$85.69
lifetime, all-route, exact on-chain
USDC sent on
$4.92
5.7% of received
Settled and attributed
$0.00
no measured day yet
Distinct amounts
24
average $0.97
7 / 30-day trend
—
a trend needs 5 measured days on each side and at least $1 a measured day to divide into; this address does not clear both yet, so no percentage is printed
What we concluded from them computed
Derived figures, each stating the arithmetic behind it.
Reality ratio
94.26%
retained — processed
Confidence
Medium
17 payers · 24 distinct amounts
Volume backing
Elevated
$85.69 backed by 17 payers and 24 distinct amounts
Sybil state
unchecked
funding provenance not measured
Average per active day
$0.00
no active day
Consistency
0%
of days since first settlement had activity
Why this verdict
Named rule R3 · Organic payments, no circular flow
Payments arrive in varied amounts at irregular intervals, and the money does not circle back to the people who sent it.
Kept of received94.26%
Distinct payers17
Distinct amounts24
In, out and kept — 2026-10-08
One day, measured two ways. These are different bases:
never add them together, and never divide one into the other. The day shown is always yesterday or
earlier — the settled series is reconstructed the following morning, so today is never complete.
Received
Forwarded
Kept
Via the x402 rail
$0.04reconstructed from exact-scheme settlements
$0.00nothing paid onward on the rail
$0.04received — forwarded, both from the settlement store
All USDC routes
$1.04every USDC transfer in, rail or not
$0.00USDC only; the fold does not follow other tokens
$1.04received — forwarded, both from the fold
Measured through Base block 52,351,164.
One day only. There is no per-day series across the whole history: the outbound layer
began recording on 2026-08-05, and this panel shows a single day from it.
Who funded the payers
Sybil stateunchecked
First funder of the payersnot measured
Payers17 distinct paying addresses · 24 distinct payment sizes
A shared first-funder is a shared-funder pattern, so we name it.
The test treats it as a signal only when the funder is not infrastructure and covers 50% or more of payers
— most wallets legitimately get their first funds from one exchange, bridge or router.
Time and trust
First seen
Entered the register on 2026-10-10.
Final through — · no streak.
Verdict history
Every snapshot ever taken, never rewritten.
1 snapshot recorded · no verdict change: this agent has held the same verdict since first seen.
Corrections
No published correction affects this agent.
Late writes
No day for this agent has ever been completed after publication.
Basis
Snapshot 2026-10-10 · methodology v3.2.
Retained and processed are never summed. Retained is clamped at zero, so it can overstate but never understate.
Check it yourself. Every figure on this page is reconstructed from public Base
chain state. No API key, no account, no trust required — open the address and compare the USDC
transfers against what we show.
Notes and limits
Paid through
coinbase 59 settlements $9.19 USDC 20 submitters · 2026-10-02 to 2026-10-08. 59 settlement(s) in the window. Every one of them is attributed to a named operator. Settlement-scoped and 7 days wide, a different basis from the lifetime total above. A submitter we cannot name is counted under unnamed, never dropped and never guessed.
Coverage of the daily series
0.00% of this agent’s money. The chart and the day strip are drawn from that series; the lifetime totals are not, and the two are never added together.
Per day: settled
no attributed day for this address yet, so the daily panels are omitted rather than drawn empty.
What this page cannot show for this agent
- First seen no VERDICT-BACKED day for this address — the days charted above are measured but were not judged at the time
- Volume processed, 30-day no daily row exists for this address yet, so there is no window to total
- Provenance grade per dollar this address has not been graded for provenance yet
- Every day renders no VERDICT-BACKED day for this address — the days charted above are measured but were not judged at the time
- Final through no VERDICT-BACKED day for this address — the days charted above are measured but were not judged at the time
- Daily averages no VERDICT-BACKED day for this address — the days charted above are measured but were not judged at the time
- 7 / 30-day trend a trend needs TWO measured periods; this address does not yet have an earlier window to compare against
- Streak no VERDICT-BACKED day for this address — the days charted above are measured but were not judged at the time
- Consistency no VERDICT-BACKED day for this address — the days charted above are measured but were not judged at the time
- Verdict history only one snapshot exists — this address is new
- Verdict changes no prior snapshot to compare against
- Coverage badge no VERDICT-BACKED day for this address — the days charted above are measured but were not judged at the time
How a rule works here
One sentence per rule, stating what the rule tests and citing figures already on this page. The threshold itself is not published, so it cannot be gamed. Rules are named so that a verdict which changes can be pointed at. The full set of rules
Everything else is measured, not inferred. A figure we do not hold is never rendered as zero.
