checked 2026-10-11
api.surplusintelligence.ai
0x0f99fc0cbd7a114b2da171fda5a0167858f7afc2
#84 of 793 by verified x402 revenue top 11%|
Unknown
Operator domainwhere the name comes from
Receives payments and keeps 4.2% of them.
★ Whether any address is operated by an AI agent is not verified. On-chain records show that a payment settled, not who or what decided to make it.
What it says it does · published by the operator in a public x402 directory
Get OpenAI-compatible inference from many models at market prices via Surplus Intelligence.
Declared endpoint
https://api.surplusintelligence.ai/v1/chat/completionsOperator siteapi.surplusintelligence.aiobserved serving this address’s endpoints, not attested
The operator’s claim, not our finding. We print it beside the money so
you can judge whether the two agree. Against it, the chain shows $127,741.80 received from
140 payers across 57,071 payments,
and $5,404.53 kept.
Measured
Received
$127,741.80USDC
lifetime, exact on-chain · 3.8% proven x402 by settlement record
Kept
≤ $5,404.53USDC
upper bound · USDC only
Payers
140
exact · every payer captured
Payments
57,071
exact total
Classification — what we decided from those measurements, never a rating
Verdict, every day we ran
Verdict each day
organic payments on all 1 measured day
How a verdict can change
Every change is adjudicated in public and logged with its date and reason. Nothing here
is edited silently, and no verdict is ever removed from this row.
Trends not verdict-backed
Every day in the span as a table (25 rows, 13 measured)
| day | settled USDC | settlements | average |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-17 | $0.00 | — | — |
| 2026-09-18 | not measured — AQUIX did not run that day | ||
| 2026-09-19 | not measured — AQUIX did not run that day | ||
| 2026-09-20 | not measured — AQUIX did not run that day | ||
| 2026-09-21 | not measured — AQUIX did not run that day | ||
| 2026-09-22 | $0.00 | — | — |
| 2026-09-23 | not measured — AQUIX did not run that day | ||
| 2026-09-24 | not measured — AQUIX did not run that day | ||
| 2026-09-25 | not measured — AQUIX did not run that day | ||
| 2026-09-26 | not measured — AQUIX did not run that day | ||
| 2026-09-27 | not measured — AQUIX did not run that day | ||
| 2026-09-28 | not measured — AQUIX did not run that day | ||
| 2026-09-29 | $0.00 | — | — |
| 2026-09-30 | not measured — AQUIX did not run that day | ||
| 2026-10-01 | not measured — AQUIX did not run that day | ||
| 2026-10-02 | $125.37 | — | — |
| 2026-10-03 | $254.00 | — | — |
| 2026-10-04 | $0.10 | — | — |
| 2026-10-05 | $0.29 | — | — |
| 2026-10-06 | $312.23 | — | — |
| 2026-10-07 | $890.55 | — | — |
| 2026-10-08 | $779.49 | — | — |
| 2026-10-09 | $1,871.09 | — | — |
| 2026-10-10 | $664.21 | — | — |
| 2026-10-11 | $0.72 | — | — |
These days were measured but not judged. We hold
10,839 settlements worth $4,898.05 across
13 days (2026-09-17 to 2026-10-11),
but no verdict was recorded for those days at the time. They are charted so the money is visible,
and marked so the difference is not lost. Average per day shown $376.77
· of the days present, not of the calendar.
Where it sends
0x7f80…90d315.7%
0x4207…24e014.1%
0x1e97…de9e14.0%
0xadb8…f26213.8%
0x313d…2d5612.4%
all others29.9%
Shares of every USDC dollar that left this address, for its
whole history. 324 destinations in total.
How it was paid
x402 confirmed — 10,839 settlements on record. Every one is a USDC transfer whose transaction carried a matching EIP-3009 payment authorisation, reconstructed from public Base state. No sampler has graded this address, so there is no second opinion to show — the settlements are the whole of what we know, and they are proof. AQUIX’s settlement record runs continuously from 2026-07-07; 2026-06-29 to 2026-07-06 is not in AQUIX’s record for any address, and payments before the record are not counted here.
Where the money went
destination
USDC sent
share
0x7f80…90d3
$19,217.94
15.7%
0x4207…24e0
$17,267.03
14.1%
0x1e97…de9e
$17,156.72
14.0%
0xadb8…f262
$16,843.50
13.8%
0x313d…2d56
$15,223.32
12.4%
0xc9a2…bba1
$7,393.11
6.0%
0x8a0d…b8b6
$3,683.34
3.0%
0x53a9…80aa
$3,656.10
3.0%
Other 316 destinations below the top 8
$21,896.22
17.9%
These are addresses, not identities · we name one only where
a public source already does. 1 of them hold a verdict of
their own. This does not include the ETH reported below — the fold is USDC-only.
What we read off the chain measured
Facts, not judgements. Every figure below is USDC taken from Base settlements.
USDC received
$127,741.80
lifetime, all-route, exact on-chain
USDC sent on
$122,337.27
95.8% of received
Settled and attributed
$4,898.05
10,839 settlements on 13 days · 2026-09-17 to 2026-10-11 · the daily charts draw $0.00 of it
Distinct amounts
17,295
average $2.36
7 / 30-day trend
—
a trend needs 5 measured days on each side and at least $1 a measured day to divide into; this address does not clear both yet, so no percentage is printed
Not counted in retained
0.568 ETH
left this address in 37 transfer(s). Retained counts USDC only, so it is an upper bound · this movement is real and is not in it. No dollar value is assigned.
What we concluded from them computed
Derived figures, each stating the arithmetic behind it.
Reality ratio
4.23%
retained — processed
Confidence
High
140 payers · 17,295 distinct amounts
Volume backing
Low
$127,741.80 backed by 140 payers and 17,295 distinct amounts
Sybil state
unchecked
funding provenance not measured
Average per active day
$0.00
no active day
Consistency
0%
of days since first settlement had activity
Why this verdict
No named rule was decisive
None of our named rules was decisive for this address. Separately, 0.4% of everything it received went back to the addresses that sent it — it kept 99.6%.
Our rules that promote an address to a verified service refuse it above 30% circulation. Because no rule fired here that test was never applied — so rather than call it a service that earns, this page says what the money actually did.
This is not an accusation. Money returning to the same counterparties is exactly what a trading agent, a settlement loop or a refund flow looks like. We publish the measurement and the fact that no rule decided it; we do not infer intent from either.
Kept of received4.23%
Distinct payers140
Distinct amounts17,295
In, out and kept — 2026-10-10
One day, measured two ways. These are different bases:
never add them together, and never divide one into the other. The day shown is always yesterday or
earlier — the settled series is reconstructed the following morning, so today is never complete.
Received
Forwarded
Kept
Via the x402 rail
$664.21reconstructed from exact-scheme settlements
$0.00nothing paid onward on the rail
$664.21received — forwarded, both from the settlement store
All USDC routes
$737.97every USDC transfer in, rail or not
$3,868.50USDC only; the fold does not follow other tokens
$0.00it forwarded $3,130.53 more than it received that day, from an earlier balance; kept is never shown below zero (both from the fold)
Measured through Base block 52,443,645.
One day only. There is no per-day series across the whole history: the outbound layer
began recording on 2026-08-05, and this panel shows a single day from it.
Who funded the payers
Sybil stateunchecked
First funder of the payersnot measured
Payers140 distinct paying addresses · 17,295 distinct payment sizes
A shared first-funder is a shared-funder pattern, so we name it.
The test treats it as a signal only when the funder is not infrastructure and covers 50% or more of payers
— most wallets legitimately get their first funds from one exchange, bridge or router.
Time and trust
First seen
Entered the register on 2026-10-11.
Final through — · no streak.
Verdict history
Every snapshot ever taken, never rewritten.
1 snapshot recorded · no verdict change: this agent has held the same verdict since first seen.
Corrections
No published correction affects this agent.
Late writes
No day for this agent has ever been completed after publication.
Basis
Snapshot 2026-10-11 · methodology v3.2.
Retained and processed are never summed. Retained is clamped at zero, so it can overstate but never understate.
Check it yourself. Every figure on this page is reconstructed from public Base
chain state. No API key, no account, no trust required — open the address and compare the USDC
transfers against what we show.
Notes and limits
Paid through
coinbase 9,583 settlements $4,518.58 USDC 20 submitters · 2026-10-05 to 2026-10-11. 9,583 settlement(s) in the window. Every one of them is attributed to a named operator. Settlement-scoped and 7 days wide, a different basis from the lifetime total above. A submitter we cannot name is counted under unnamed, never dropped and never guessed.
Coverage of the daily series
3.83% of this agent’s money. The chart and the day strip are drawn from that series; the lifetime totals are not, and the two are never added together.
Per day: settled
no attributed day for this address yet, so the daily panels are omitted rather than drawn empty.
What this page cannot show for this agent
- Which rule fired no named rule was decisive; the base classifier decided
- First seen no VERDICT-BACKED day for this address — the days charted above are measured but were not judged at the time
- Volume processed, 30-day no daily row exists for this address yet, so there is no window to total
- Provenance grade per dollar this address has not been graded for provenance yet
- Every day renders no VERDICT-BACKED day for this address — the days charted above are measured but were not judged at the time
- Final through no VERDICT-BACKED day for this address — the days charted above are measured but were not judged at the time
- Daily averages no VERDICT-BACKED day for this address — the days charted above are measured but were not judged at the time
- 7 / 30-day trend a trend needs TWO measured periods; this address does not yet have an earlier window to compare against
- Streak no VERDICT-BACKED day for this address — the days charted above are measured but were not judged at the time
- Consistency no VERDICT-BACKED day for this address — the days charted above are measured but were not judged at the time
- Verdict history only one snapshot exists — this address is new
- Verdict changes no prior snapshot to compare against
- Coverage badge no VERDICT-BACKED day for this address — the days charted above are measured but were not judged at the time
How a rule works here
One sentence per rule, stating what the rule tests and citing figures already on this page. The threshold itself is not published, so it cannot be gamed. Rules are named so that a verdict which changes can be pointed at. The full set of rules
Everything else is measured, not inferred. A figure we do not hold is never rendered as zero.
