{
 "generated_at": "2026-09-20T09:55:07.075Z",
 "sanity": {
  "published_counted": 521,
  "headline_says": 521,
  "match": true
 },
 "label_set": {
  "rail_manifest": 33,
  "exclusions": 37,
  "distinct": 45,
  "all_negative": true,
  "note": "Every labelled address is INFRASTRUCTURE hand-verified by bytecode or published deployment. There is not one hand-verified TRUE agent in the set, so it measures FALSE POSITIVES only. Recall is unmeasurable from it."
 },
 "false_positives": {
  "profiled": 17,
  "called_real_service": 14,
  "marked_in_scope": 14,
  "reached_registry": 1,
  "note": "The classifier did not stop them — a hand-maintained exclusion list did, and that list only ever contains what a human already went and found. Infrastructure of this shape that nobody has found yet is not excluded by anything."
 },
 "contradictions": [
  {
   "test": "BOT-LOOP called on ZERO outflow",
   "addresses": 58,
   "published": 0
  },
  {
   "test": "REAL-SERVICE called on a SINGLE sampled payer",
   "addresses": 175,
   "published": 173
  },
  {
   "test": "any verdict on a ZERO-SIZE sample",
   "addresses": 0,
   "published": 0
  },
  {
   "test": "PUBLISHED-ELIGIBLE (scope=true) with zero payments recorded",
   "addresses": 0,
   "published": 0
  }
 ],
 "self_contradiction": {
  "addresses": 0,
  "rate_pct": 0
 },
 "thin_evidence": {
  "addresses": 173,
  "rate_pct": 33.2
 },
 "headline": {
  "published": 521,
  "contradicting": 173,
  "rate_pct": 33.2
 },
 "limits": [
  "This is a LOWER BOUND, not an accuracy figure.",
  "It cannot see an agent wrongly EXCLUDED — only wrong verdicts among those published.",
  "It cannot see a wrong verdict that is internally consistent.",
  "The label set is adversarially biased: those addresses were hand-excluded BECAUSE they look like services."
 ]
}